Filed: Mar. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2723 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Paul Tracy Allensworth, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: March 2, 2011 Filed: March 7, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Tracy Allensworth appeals the district court’s1 judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possessing coc
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-2723 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Paul Tracy Allensworth, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: March 2, 2011 Filed: March 7, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Tracy Allensworth appeals the district court’s1 judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of possessing coca..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-2723
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Paul Tracy Allensworth, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: March 2, 2011
Filed: March 7, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Tracy Allensworth appeals the district court’s1 judgment entered upon a
jury verdict finding him guilty of possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Allensworth to 132
months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. His counsel has moved to
withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing
that the district court abused its discretion in denying Allensworth’s motion for a
1
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
mistrial based on improper questions by the prosecutor during cross examination of
Allensworth.
We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the
motion for a mistrial. See United States v. Swift,
623 F.3d 618, 623 (8th Cir. 2010);
United States v. Weaver,
554 F.3d 718, 723-24 (8th Cir. 2009); United States v.
Boesen,
541 F.3d 838, 847 (8th Cir. 2008). Having reviewed the record
independently under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous
issue. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the district
court’s judgment.
______________________________
-2-