Filed: Jun. 07, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-3803 _ Israel Ortega-Romero, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General * of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: June 2, 2011 Filed: June 7, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Israel Ortega-Romero petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-3803 _ Israel Ortega-Romero, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Board * of Immigration Appeals. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General * of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: June 2, 2011 Filed: June 7, 2011 _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan citizen Israel Ortega-Romero petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appea..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-3803
___________
Israel Ortega-Romero, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the Board
* of Immigration Appeals.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *
of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: June 2, 2011
Filed: June 7, 2011
___________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Guatemalan citizen Israel Ortega-Romero petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) vacating an immigration judge’s grant of special
rule cancellation of removal and ordering him removed. We conclude substantial
evidence supports the BIA’s finding that Ortega-Romero did not meet the requirement
of good moral character, and thus we agree with the BIA’s determination that he did
not establish eligibility for special rule cancellation of removal. See
Ikenokwalu-White v. INS,
316 F.3d 798, 802-05 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we deny the petition.
______________________________