Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Elizabeth Anderson, 11-1299 (2011)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 11-1299 Visitors: 35
Filed: Jun. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-1299 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Elizabeth Anderson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant, * * Unifund CCR Partners, * * Defendant. * _ Submitted: June 24, 2011 Filed: June 29, 2011 _ Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Elizabeth Anderson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in this foreclo
More
                      United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 11-1299
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
             Appellee,                  *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * District of Nebraska.
Elizabeth Anderson,                     *
                                        * [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellant,                 *
                                        *
Unifund CCR Partners,                   *
                                        *
             Defendant.                 *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: June 24, 2011
                                Filed: June 29, 2011
                                 ___________

Before BYE, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Elizabeth Anderson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in this foreclosure action. After carefully reviewing the record, we conclude
that summary judgment was proper for the reasons the district court stated, and we
find no abuse of discretion in the refusal to appoint counsel to represent Ms.

      1
        The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.
Anderson, see Davis v. Scott, 
94 F.3d 444
, 447 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                      -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer