Filed: Aug. 18, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-3489 _ Joseph Fields, III, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Douglas L. Weber, Individually and in * his official capacity as Warden, South * [UNPUBLISHED] Dakota State Penitentiary; Daryl * Slykhuis, Individually and in his * official capacity as Deputy Warden, * South Dakota State Penitentiary, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 10, 2011 Filed: August 18, 2011
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 10-3489 _ Joseph Fields, III, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Douglas L. Weber, Individually and in * his official capacity as Warden, South * [UNPUBLISHED] Dakota State Penitentiary; Daryl * Slykhuis, Individually and in his * official capacity as Deputy Warden, * South Dakota State Penitentiary, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 10, 2011 Filed: August 18, 2011 ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-3489
___________
Joseph Fields, III, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Douglas L. Weber, Individually and in *
his official capacity as Warden, South * [UNPUBLISHED]
Dakota State Penitentiary; Daryl *
Slykhuis, Individually and in his *
official capacity as Deputy Warden, *
South Dakota State Penitentiary, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: August 10, 2011
Filed: August 18, 2011
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Joseph Fields appeals from the adverse grant of summary judgment entered by
the District Court1 in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon careful de novo review, see
Johnson v. Blaukat,
453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary
1
The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of South Dakota.
judgment was proper for the reasons stated in the District Court’s order. Accordingly,
we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-