Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

T. Lamar Caudle v. Rubey M. Hulen, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri, 15538 (1956)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15538 Visitors: 26
Filed: Mar. 17, 1956
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 231 F.2d 667 T. Lamar CAUDLE, Petitioner, v. Rubey M. HULEN, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. No. 15538. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. March 17, 1956. Charles J. Margiotti, Pittsburgh, Pa., C. Arthur Anderson, John J. Hooker, Nashville, Tenn., and W. M. Nicholson, Charlotte, N.C., for petitioner. Harry Richards, U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Wyllys S. Newcomb, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., John B. Buckley, Jr., Sp. Atty., Department of Justice, and Alb
More

231 F.2d 667

T. Lamar CAUDLE, Petitioner,
v.
Rubey M. HULEN, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.

No. 15538.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

March 17, 1956.

Charles J. Margiotti, Pittsburgh, Pa., C. Arthur Anderson, John J. Hooker, Nashville, Tenn., and W. M. Nicholson, Charlotte, N.C., for petitioner.

Harry Richards, U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., Wyllys S. Newcomb, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., John B. Buckley, Jr., Sp. Atty., Department of Justice, and Albert M. Christopher, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

1

Petition of petitioner for writ of mandamus denied, without prejudice to right of trial court, on its own motion or on motion of the parties, to reconsider the question of transfer at any time before trial should any such change of circumstances develop in the situation as to make it appeal to the trial court to be desirable and in the interest of justice to order such transfer.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer