Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. J. M. Roark, 15994_1 (1958)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15994_1 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 03, 1958
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 257 F.2d 810 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. J. M. ROARK et al. No. 15994. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. June 3, 1958. Edward L. Scheufler, U.S. Atty., and Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for appellant. C. E. Ruyle, Slankard, Ruyle & Henry, Neosho, Mo., William H. Curtis, Morrison, Hecker, Buck, Cozad & Rogers, Joseph R. Stewart and Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., and Lathrop, Righter, Blackwell, Gordon & Parker, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees. PER C
More

257 F.2d 810

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
J. M. ROARK et al.

No. 15994.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 3, 1958.

Edward L. Scheufler, U.S. Atty., and Horace Warren Kimbrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.

C. E. Ruyle, Slankard, Ruyle & Henry, Neosho, Mo., William H. Curtis, Morrison, Hecker, Buck, Cozad & Rogers, Joseph R. Stewart and Joseph E. Stevens, Jr., and Lathrop, Righter, Blackwell, Gordon & Parker, Kansas City, Mo., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

1

Appeal from District Court dismissed as premature, without prejudice, and cause remanded to District Court, on motion of appellant.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer