Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Antonio Murillo-Cadena v. Eric H. Holder, Jr., 13-3604 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 13-3604 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 13-3604 _ Antonio Murillo-Cadena lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Eric H. Holder, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: May 30, 2014 Filed: June 12, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Mexican citizen Antonio Murillo-Cadena petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, denying his req
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 13-3604
                        ___________________________

                             Antonio Murillo-Cadena

                             lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                           v.

                                Eric H. Holder, Jr.

                            lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                    ____________

                      Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Board of Immigration Appeals
                                  ____________

                             Submitted: May 30, 2014
                               Filed: June 12, 2014
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Mexican citizen Antonio Murillo-Cadena petitions for review of an order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals, denying his request to reopen his removal
proceedings. After careful review, we conclude that no abuse of discretion occurred.
See Chen v. Holder, No. 13-1103, 
2014 WL 1887364
, at *2 (8th Cir. May, 13, 2014)
(abuse-of-discretion standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the petition for
review. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




                                      -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer