Filed: Oct. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2408 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Troy J. Clark lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge _ Submitted: October 22, 2014 Filed: October 27, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Troy Clark directly appeals the sentence that the district court1 imposed upon r
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2408 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Troy J. Clark lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge _ Submitted: October 22, 2014 Filed: October 27, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Troy Clark directly appeals the sentence that the district court1 imposed upon re..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-2408
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Troy J. Clark
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Ft. Dodge
____________
Submitted: October 22, 2014
Filed: October 27, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Troy Clark directly appeals the sentence that the district court1 imposed upon
revoking his supervised release. He argues that the sentence is unreasonable. Upon
1
The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
careful review, see United States v. Miller,
557 F.3d 910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009)
(appellate review of revocation sentence), we conclude that the within-Guidelines-
range revocation sentence is not unreasonable, see United States v. Petreikis,
551
F.3d 822, 824 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district
court. We also grant counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw.
______________________________
-2-