Filed: Oct. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1339 _ Matthew T. White lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph _ Submitted: October 23, 2014 Filed: October 29, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Matthew T. White appeals
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1339 _ Matthew T. White lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph _ Submitted: October 23, 2014 Filed: October 29, 2014 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Matthew T. White appeals t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1339
___________________________
Matthew T. White
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph
____________
Submitted: October 23, 2014
Filed: October 29, 2014
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Matthew T. White appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
child’s insurance benefits. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the administrative
1
The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
law judge’s (ALJ’s) opinion is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a
whole, including new evidence the Appeals Council considered. See Davidson v.
Astrue,
501 F.3d 987, 989-90 (8th Cir. 2007). Specifically, we find no validity to the
challenges White raises to the ALJ’s determination of his residual functional capacity
(RFC). See Eichelberger v. Barnhart,
390 F.3d 584, 591 (8th Cir. 2004) (claimant has
burden of establishing RFC; factors in RFC determination). The judgment of the
district court is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-