Filed: Feb. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1289 _ Eugene P. Dickson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. John M. McHugh, Secretary of the United States Army lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: January 19, 2015 Filed: February 4, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Eugene Dickson appeals the district cour
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-1289 _ Eugene P. Dickson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. John M. McHugh, Secretary of the United States Army lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: January 19, 2015 Filed: February 4, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Eugene Dickson appeals the district court..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-1289
___________________________
Eugene P. Dickson
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
John M. McHugh, Secretary of the United States Army
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
____________
Submitted: January 19, 2015
Filed: February 4, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Eugene Dickson appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action asserting age and race discrimination. Upon careful de novo
1
The Honorable Brian S. Miller, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Arkansas.
review, we conclude that the district court’s decision was correct. See Torgerson v.
City of Rochester,
643 F.3d 1031, 1042 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of
review); see also Edmund v. MidAmerican Energy Co.,
299 F.3d 679, 686 (8th Cir.
2002) (federal courts do not sit as super personnel department reviewing wisdom or
fairness of business judgments made by employers, except to extent those judgments
involve intentional discrimination).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-