Pamela Jones v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 14-2198 (2015)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 14-2198
Visitors: 28
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2198 _ Pamela L. Jones lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: February 10, 2015 Filed: March 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pamela L. Jones appeals the dist
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-2198 _ Pamela L. Jones lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: February 10, 2015 Filed: March 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Pamela L. Jones appeals the distr..
More
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 14-2198 ___________________________ Pamela L. Jones lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________ Submitted: February 10, 2015 Filed: March 3, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Pamela L. Jones appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of disability insurance benefits. Liberally construing Jones’s brief, she appears to 1 The Honorable Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska, now retired. challenge the Adminstrative Law Judge’s (ALJ’s) credibility findings. Following careful review of the parties’ submissions and the record before us, we conclude that the ALJ did not err in making her credibility findings and that the ALJ’s determination is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________ -2-
Source: CourtListener
