Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Levester Gillard v. Maurice Culclager, 14-3067 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 14-3067 Visitors: 27
Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3067 _ Levester Gillard lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Maurice Culclager; Gaylon Lay; Mark Mallard; Lisa Hall; Ray Hobbs; Laura Norman; J. D. Rana; Raymond Naylor; Larry May; Terrie Banister lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: February 26, 2015 Filed: March 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, a
More
               United States Court of Appeals
                          For the Eighth Circuit
                      ___________________________

                              No. 14-3067
                      ___________________________

                                Levester Gillard

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                         v.

  Maurice Culclager; Gaylon Lay; Mark Mallard; Lisa Hall; Ray Hobbs; Laura
      Norman; J. D. Rana; Raymond Naylor; Larry May; Terrie Banister

                    lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                     ____________

                  Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
                                ____________

                         Submitted: February 26, 2015
                            Filed: March 3, 2015
                                [Unpublished]
                               ____________

Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.
      Arkansas inmate Levester Gillard appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Arkansas prison officials violated his rights
under the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment based on his disciplinary conviction for assaulting an officer during a
prison riot. Following careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims, 
200 F.3d 1170
,
1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we find no reversible error. We therefore affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer