Filed: Mar. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3067 _ Levester Gillard lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Maurice Culclager; Gaylon Lay; Mark Mallard; Lisa Hall; Ray Hobbs; Laura Norman; J. D. Rana; Raymond Naylor; Larry May; Terrie Banister lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: February 26, 2015 Filed: March 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 14-3067 _ Levester Gillard lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Maurice Culclager; Gaylon Lay; Mark Mallard; Lisa Hall; Ray Hobbs; Laura Norman; J. D. Rana; Raymond Naylor; Larry May; Terrie Banister lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: February 26, 2015 Filed: March 3, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, an..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 14-3067
___________________________
Levester Gillard
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Maurice Culclager; Gaylon Lay; Mark Mallard; Lisa Hall; Ray Hobbs; Laura
Norman; J. D. Rana; Raymond Naylor; Larry May; Terrie Banister
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
____________
Submitted: February 26, 2015
Filed: March 3, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Levester Gillard appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Arkansas prison officials violated his rights
under the Eighth Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment based on his disciplinary conviction for assaulting an officer during a
prison riot. Following careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170,
1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we find no reversible error. We therefore affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
-2-