Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Arnetta Swift v. Schmaderer, 15-1680 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-1680 Visitors: 27
Filed: Aug. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1680 _ Arnetta Swift, Nee Hill born Arnetta Hill lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Schmaderer, Chief Omaha Police; John Decohort, Unknown of Omaha Police Officers; Kyler, Omaha Police Officer; John Doe, Unknown, Cohort of Omaha Police lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: August 20, 2015 Filed: August 24, 2015 [Unpublished
More
                United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 15-1680
                       ___________________________

                    Arnetta Swift, Nee Hill born Arnetta Hill

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                          v.

  Schmaderer, Chief Omaha Police; John Decohort, Unknown of Omaha Police
Officers; Kyler, Omaha Police Officer; John Doe, Unknown, Cohort of Omaha Police

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                      ____________

                   Appeal from United States District Court
                     for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                                ____________

                           Submitted: August 20, 2015
                            Filed: August 24, 2015
                                 [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before SHEPHERD, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
      Arnetta Swift appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of her pro se 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, for failure to state a claim. She also moves for appointment
of counsel on appeal. After careful de novo review, we conclude that Swift’s
complaint was properly dismissed. See Moore v. Sims, 
200 F.3d 1170
, 1171 (8th Cir.
2000) (per curiam) (preservice dismissal is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The motion for appointment of counsel is denied.
                       ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer