___________

                           No. 95-1326
                           ___________

Chen Sang Sun,                   *
                                 *
          Petitioner,            *
                                 * Petition for Review of
     v.                          * an Order of the Immigration
                                 * and Naturalization Service.
Immigration and Naturalization   *
Service,                         *      [UNPUBLISHED]
                                 *
          Respondent,            *
                           ___________

                  Submitted:   January 26, 1996

                      Filed: February 8, 1996
                           ___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

     After Chen Sang Sun, a citizen of China, entered the United
States in 1993 without inspection by an immigration officer, the
Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) ordered Sun to show
cause why he should not be deported.   Sun conceded deportability,
but applied for asylum. An Immigration Judge (IJ) denied relief,
and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Sun's appeal
of the IJ's denial of relief.      Sun now petitions for review.
Reviewing the BIA's factual findings underlying its refusal to
grant asylum under the substantial-evidence standard, see Hajiani-
Niroumand v. INS, 

, 838 (8th Cir. 1994), we deny Sun's
petition.


     The Attorney General has discretion to grant asylum to a
"refugee."   8 U.S.C. § 1158(a).    A refugee is an alien who is
unwilling to return home because of "persecution or a well-founded
fear of persecution on account of race, religion, nationality,
membership in a particular social group, or political opinion."
8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(A). Sun contended that his family was a
social group that had been mistreated because of its poverty and
resistance to government authority, and that he would be persecuted
if returned to China based on his membership in the Sun family, his
newly-acquired Christian faith, and his violation of Chinese exit
laws.


     Sun presented evidence that one of his uncles had had trouble
with Chinese authorities in 1990 or 1991 following the uncle's
refusal to repay his partners' shares of a government loan, which
culminated in a physical confrontation at the uncle's house during
which government officials and others beat the uncle. Sun and his
brother, who were nearby, intervened and were beaten as well. Sun
was required to pay a fine, and testified that government officials
thereafter would beat him if they recognized him on the street.


     Sun testified as to the following additional incidents
involving family members. Before Sun was born, another uncle was
selected by the government to work in the mines, and was unable to
afford a bribe to avoid the work. In 1981, one of Sun's other
brothers and several of his friends were convicted and sentenced
for robbery following a physical fight with government officials
who had refused to sell some beer they were carrying. After his
release from prison, this brother was unable to pay a bribe to
government officials to obtain papers he needed to legalize a
relationship with a female companion, and subsequently left for
Taiwan in a small boat.


      We agree with the BIA that Sun has not shown any connection
between the events he and his family experienced and any of the
statutory bases for asylum. See Ghasemimehr v. INS, 

,
1390 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (alien seeking asylum must show
persecution or feared persecution is based on one of five grounds

                               -2-
listed in § 1101(a)(42)(A)). As to Sun's alleged fear of future
persecution, he had to show that his fear was both "subjectively
genuine and objectively reasonable." See 

the
BIA's finding that Sun lacked such a well-founded fear, Sun must
show his evidence "`was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder
could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.'"         

v. Elias-Zacarias, 

, 483-84 (1992)).


     Having reviewed the evidence, we conclude a reasonable
factfinder could find Sun's fear of persecution was not objectively
reasonable. As the BIA noted, Sun conceded he did not belong to
any political organization in China, and presented no evidence that
he or his family openly expressed any political opinion in China
contrary to the government. He also failed to show that he will be
subjected to greater penalties for violation of Chinese exit laws
than other similarly-situated Chinese nationals. See Behzadpour v.
United States, 

, 1353 (8th Cir. 1991). We also agree
with the BIA that Sun did not show his alleged fear of religious
persecution was sufficiently objective. Because we conclude that
substantial evidence supports the denial of Sun's request for
asylum, we also affirm the BIA's withholding of deportation. See

(when an applicant is not eligible for asylum, the
applicant is necessarily not entitled to have deportation
withheld).


     Accordingly, we deny Sun's petition.


     A true copy.


          Attest:


               CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                               -3-