Filed: Apr. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: _ No. 95-3565WA _ Otis Wayne Gunn, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Bill Minor, Central City, * District of Arkansas. Arkansas Police Officer; * Don Bullock, Central City, * [UNPUBLISHED] Arkansas Police Officer; City * of Central City, Arkansas; City * of Lavaca, Arkansas, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: April 4, 1996 Filed: April 9, 1996 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Otis Wayne Gunn appeals the district cour
Summary: _ No. 95-3565WA _ Otis Wayne Gunn, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Bill Minor, Central City, * District of Arkansas. Arkansas Police Officer; * Don Bullock, Central City, * [UNPUBLISHED] Arkansas Police Officer; City * of Central City, Arkansas; City * of Lavaca, Arkansas, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: April 4, 1996 Filed: April 9, 1996 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Otis Wayne Gunn appeals the district court..
More
_____________
No. 95-3565WA
_____________
Otis Wayne Gunn, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
Bill Minor, Central City, * District of Arkansas.
Arkansas Police Officer; *
Don Bullock, Central City, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Arkansas Police Officer; City *
of Central City, Arkansas; City *
of Lavaca, Arkansas, *
*
Appellees. *
_____________
Submitted: April 4, 1996
Filed: April 9, 1996
_____________
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
_____________
PER CURIAM.
Otis Wayne Gunn appeals the district court's adverse judgment
following a bench trial in Gunn's 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action. Because Gunn
did not provide a transcript after we denied his request for one at
government expense, we cannot review the district court's factual findings.
See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Schmid v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters
and Joiners of America,
827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam),
cert. denied,
484 U.S. 1071 (1988). Accepting those findings as correct,
we conclude no error of law appears. We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.