Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Otis Wayne Gunn v. Bill Minor, 95-3565 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 95-3565 Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: _ No. 95-3565WA _ Otis Wayne Gunn, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Bill Minor, Central City, * District of Arkansas. Arkansas Police Officer; * Don Bullock, Central City, * [UNPUBLISHED] Arkansas Police Officer; City * of Central City, Arkansas; City * of Lavaca, Arkansas, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: April 4, 1996 Filed: April 9, 1996 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Otis Wayne Gunn appeals the district cour
More
                                   _____________

                                   No. 95-3565WA
                                   _____________

Otis Wayne Gunn,                    *
                                    *
                 Appellant,         *
                                    *
      v.                            *   Appeal from the United States
                                    *   District Court for the Western
Bill Minor, Central City,           *   District of Arkansas.
Arkansas Police Officer;            *
Don Bullock, Central City,          *   [UNPUBLISHED]
Arkansas Police Officer; City       *
of Central City, Arkansas; City     *
of Lavaca, Arkansas,                *
                                    *
                 Appellees.         *
                              _____________

                              Submitted:      April 4, 1996

                                Filed: April 9, 1996
                                    _____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
                              _____________


PER CURIAM.


     Otis     Wayne    Gunn   appeals   the    district   court's   adverse   judgment
following a bench trial in Gunn's 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 action.              Because Gunn
did not provide a transcript after we denied his request for one at
government expense, we cannot review the district court's factual findings.
See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Schmid v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters
and Joiners of America, 
827 F.2d 384
, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam),
cert. denied, 
484 U.S. 1071
(1988).           Accepting those findings as correct,
we conclude no error of law appears.          We thus affirm.   See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


     A true copy.


              Attest:


                      CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer