Filed: May 22, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: _ No. 95-3977NE _ Terry L. Christianson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Robert P. Houston; Attorney * General, State of Nebraska, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 13, 1996 Filed: May 22, 1996 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Terry L. Christianson appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Initially, we reject Christianson's contention that Nebraska's r
Summary: _ No. 95-3977NE _ Terry L. Christianson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Robert P. Houston; Attorney * General, State of Nebraska, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 13, 1996 Filed: May 22, 1996 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Terry L. Christianson appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Initially, we reject Christianson's contention that Nebraska's ro..
More
_____________
No. 95-3977NE
_____________
Terry L. Christianson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the District
* of Nebraska.
Robert P. Houston; Attorney *
General, State of Nebraska, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
_____________
Submitted: May 13, 1996
Filed: May 22, 1996
_____________
Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
_____________
PER CURIAM.
Terry L. Christianson appeals the district court's denial of his 28
U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Initially, we reject Christianson's contention
that Nebraska's robbery statute is constitutionally ambiguous. Having
rejected Christianson's constitutional claim, we conclude Christianson's
trial and appellate counsel were not ineffective for failing to challenge
the statute's constitutionality. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.