Filed: Aug. 20, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: _ No. 95-4045 _ Noe Martinez-Raga, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Immigration and Naturalization * Service, District Director, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 6, 1996 Filed: August 20, 1996 _ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Noe Martinez-Raga appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. After careful review of
Summary: _ No. 95-4045 _ Noe Martinez-Raga, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Immigration and Naturalization * Service, District Director, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: August 6, 1996 Filed: August 20, 1996 _ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Noe Martinez-Raga appeals from the district court's1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. After careful review of ..
More
___________
No. 95-4045
___________
Noe Martinez-Raga, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Immigration and Naturalization *
Service, District Director, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: August 6, 1996
Filed: August 20, 1996
___________
Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Noe Martinez-Raga appeals from the district court's1 order
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition for lack of
jurisdiction. After careful review of the record and the parties'
briefs, we conclude the judgment of the district court was correct.
We do not consider Martinez-Raga's argument that he is eligible for
a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), as he has not exhausted his
administrative remedies. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.
1
The HONORABLE THOMAS M. SHANAHAN, United States District
Judge for the District of Nebraska.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
2