Filed: Apr. 25, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-1543 _ Stanley Joseph, * * Petitioner/Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. James A. Gammon, * * [Unpublished] Respondent/Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 16, 1997 Filed: April 25, 19197 _ Before FAGG, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Stanley Joseph appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Jose
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-1543 _ Stanley Joseph, * * Petitioner/Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. James A. Gammon, * * [Unpublished] Respondent/Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 16, 1997 Filed: April 25, 19197 _ Before FAGG, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Stanley Joseph appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Josep..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 96-1543
___________
Stanley Joseph, *
*
Petitioner/Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
James A. Gammon, *
* [Unpublished]
Respondent/Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: April 16, 1997
Filed: April 25, 19197
___________
Before FAGG, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Stanley Joseph appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of
habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Joseph pled guilty in state court
to assorted counts of assault, robbery, and battery. After his petition for
post conviction relief was denied, he filed this action claiming that he
had been improperly classified as a Class X offender under Mo. Rev. Stat.
§ 558.019.4(3)and that his counsel in state court had been ineffective and
had a conflict of interest with him. The district court1 denied relief
after concluding that Joseph had procedurally defaulted the sentencing
claim, that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary on the other claims,
and that the claims were without merit. After reviewing
1
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief United States District
Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
the record and considering the parties’ arguments, we affirm on the basis
of the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-
2