Filed: Jun. 13, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1447 _ Michael Odell Johnson, etc., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * * _ Submitted: June 10, 1997 Filed: June 13, 1997 _ Before MURPHY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. After the district court2 denied his motion to suppress evidence, Michael O. Johnson pled guilty to one cour
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1447 _ Michael Odell Johnson, etc., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * * _ Submitted: June 10, 1997 Filed: June 13, 1997 _ Before MURPHY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. After the district court2 denied his motion to suppress evidence, Michael O. Johnson pled guilty to one court..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 97-1447
___________
Michael Odell Johnson, etc., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota
United States of America, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
*
___________
Submitted: June 10, 1997
Filed: June 13, 1997
___________
Before MURPHY and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE,1 District Judge.
___________
PER CURIAM.
After the district court2 denied his motion to suppress evidence,
Michael O. Johnson pled guilty to one court of possession with intent to
distribute crack cocaine and was sentenced to 120 months in prison.
Johnson preserved his right to appeal the
1
The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District
of South Dakota, sitting by designation.
2
The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
denial of his suppression motion. Having carefully reviewed the record,
we agree with the district court that there was no Fourth Amendment
violation because Johnson abandoned the drugs before any seizure occurred.
See California v. Hodari D.,
499 U.S. 621 (1991). The judgment of the
district court is affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-