Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Priscilla M. Waitek v. Dalkon Shield, 96-3332 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-3332 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 03, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-3332NI _ Priscilla M. Waitek; Marc Waitek, * * Appellees, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Northern v. * District of Iowa. * The Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: May 23, 1997 Filed: June 3, 1997 _ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. The Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust appeals the district court's denial of the Trust's motions for judgment as a
More
                          United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   _____________

                                   No. 96-3332NI
                                   _____________

Priscilla M. Waitek; Marc Waitek,    *
                                     *
                  Appellees,         * Appeal from the United States
                                     * District Court for the Northern
     v.                              * District of Iowa.
                                     *
The Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust,   *       [PUBLISHED]
                                     *
                  Appellant.         *
                               _____________

                            Submitted: May 23, 1997
                                Filed: June 3, 1997
                                 _____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
                           _____________

PER CURIAM.

       The Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust appeals the district court's denial of the
Trust's motions for judgment as a matter of law and a new trial. See Waitek v. Dalkon
Shield Claimants Trust, 
934 F. Supp. 1068
, 1100 (N.D. Iowa 1996). We review the
district court's rulings under well-established standards. Based on the record before us,
we find no error that would require reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R.
47B.

      A true copy.
            Attest:
                   CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer