Filed: Jul. 02, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-3351 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Eldon L. Fisher, Doing Business as * [Unpublished] Medical Arts Pharmacy, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: March 10, 1997 Filed: July 2, 1997 _ Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Eldon L. Fisher appeals from his convict
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-3351 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Eldon L. Fisher, Doing Business as * [Unpublished] Medical Arts Pharmacy, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: March 10, 1997 Filed: July 2, 1997 _ Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Eldon L. Fisher appeals from his convicti..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 96-3351
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Missouri.
*
Eldon L. Fisher, Doing Business as * [Unpublished]
Medical Arts Pharmacy, *
*
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: March 10, 1997
Filed: July 2, 1997
___________
Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS
SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Eldon L. Fisher appeals from his conviction for Medicaid fraud in violation of
42 U.S.C. ยง 1320a-7b(a)(1)(i) and asserts that the district court1 erred in instructing the
jury, admitting certain evidence, and limiting the cross-examination of certain
witnesses. He also takes exception to the sentence that the district court imposed. After
1
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that there was no
error. Because a thorough opinion on these matters would lack precedential value, we
affirm the trial court's judgment in all respects. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-