Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Alvin J. Johnson, 97-2480 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-2480 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 19, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-2480EA _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Alvin J. Johnson, also known as Albert * [UNPUBLISHED] Johnson, * * Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 16, 1997 Filed: September 19, 1997 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Alvin J. Johnson appeals from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district court. On ap
More
                          United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   _____________

                                   No. 97-2480EA
                                   _____________

United States of America,              *
                                       *
                    Appellee,          * Appeal from the United States
                                       * District Court for the Eastern
      v.                               * District of Arkansas.
                                       *
Alvin J. Johnson, also known as Albert *      [UNPUBLISHED]
Johnson,                               *
                                       *
                    Appellant.         *
                                 _____________

                            Submitted: September 16, 1997
                                Filed: September 19, 1997
                                 _____________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                          _____________

PER CURIAM.

       Alvin J. Johnson appeals from the guidelines sentence imposed by the district
court. On appeal, Johnson renews the challenge he made in the district court, namely,
the 100-to-1 sentencing ratio for crack versus powder cocaine violates Johnson's equal
protection and due process rights. Johnson's challenge, however, is foreclosed by our
decisions upholding the constitutionality of the 100-to-1 ratio. See, e.g., United States
v. Carter, 
91 F.3d 1196
, 1197-99 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam); United States v.
Jackson, 
67 F.3d 1359
, 1367 (8th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 
116 S. Ct. 1684
(1996); see
also United States v. Jackson, 
64 F.3d 1213
, 1220 (8th Cir. 1995) (rejecting challenge
based on rule of lenity), cert. denied, 
116 S. Ct. 966
(1996).

      Accoridngly, we affirm Johnson's sentence.

      A true copy.

             Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer