Filed: Sep. 11, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-2208MN _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District of v. * Minnesota. * Malachi Andrews, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 4, 1997 Filed: September 11, 1997 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After Malachi Andrews was sentenced for drug-related charges, including using a firearm during a drug offense, the Supreme Court de
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-2208MN _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District of v. * Minnesota. * Malachi Andrews, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: September 4, 1997 Filed: September 11, 1997 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. After Malachi Andrews was sentenced for drug-related charges, including using a firearm during a drug offense, the Supreme Court dec..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 97-2208MN
_____________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the District of
v. * Minnesota.
*
Malachi Andrews, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellant. *
_____________
Submitted: September 4, 1997
Filed: September 11, 1997
_____________
Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
_____________
PER CURIAM.
After Malachi Andrews was sentenced for drug-related charges, including using
a firearm during a drug offense, the Supreme Court decided Bailey v. United States,
116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). In light of Bailey, the district court vacated the sentence
originally imposed on the firearm conviction and imposed a revised sentence on
Andrews's drug conviction with an enhancement based on his possession of a firearm.
On appeal, Andrews contends the district court improperly resentenced him on his drug
conviction. Andrews's arguments, however, are foreclosed by our recent decision in
United States v. Harrison,
113 F.3d 135, 137-38 (8th Cir. 1997). We thus affirm
Andrews's revised drug sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-