Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Lisa R. Childers v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 97-1615 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-1615 Visitors: 8
Filed: Sep. 11, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1615EA _ Lisa R. Childers, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Wal-Mart, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 5, 1997 Filed: September 11, 1997 _ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lisa R. Childers appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Childers's employer in Childers's employment discriminatio
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-1615EA _____________ Lisa R. Childers, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Arkansas. * Wal-Mart, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _____________ Submitted: September 5, 1997 Filed: September 11, 1997 _____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM. Lisa R. Childers appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Childers's employer in Childers's employment discrimination lawsuit. Having carefully considered the record, and assuming Childers established the elements of a prima facie case, we agree with the district court that there is no substantial evidence in the record tending to show that Wal-Mart's articulated reasons for Childers's demotion were a pretext for sex discrimination. We thus conclude the district court correctly granted summary judgment, and we affirm without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer