Filed: Nov. 28, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1792 _ Bobby Davis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Cheyenne Industries, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 20, 1997 Filed: November 28, 1997 _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Bobby Davis brought this Title VII action, alleging that his former employer, Cheyenne Industries, Inc., discharged him because
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1792 _ Bobby Davis, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Cheyenne Industries, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 20, 1997 Filed: November 28, 1997 _ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Bobby Davis brought this Title VII action, alleging that his former employer, Cheyenne Industries, Inc., discharged him because o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 97-1792
___________
Bobby Davis, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Cheyenne Industries, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 20, 1997
Filed: November 28, 1997
___________
Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Bobby Davis brought this Title VII action, alleging that his former employer,
Cheyenne Industries, Inc., discharged him because of his race, African-American.
Following a bench trial, the district court1 found that Davis had failed to demonstrate
that Cheyenne&s proffered reason for terminating him was pretextual or that his
discharge was racially motivated. Davis appeals.
1
The Honorable James Maxwell Moody, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
As Davis has failed to provide a transcript or to request one at government
expense, we cannot review the district court&s factual findings. See Van Treese v.
Blome,
7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam). We conclude that based on its
factual findings, the district court correctly entered judgment in favor of Cheyenne. See
St. Mary&s Honor Ctr. v. Hicks,
509 U.S. 502, 507-08 (1993); Harvey v. Anheuser-
Busch, Inc.,
38 F.3d 968, 973 (8th Cir. 1994).
The judgment is affirmed.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-