Filed: Nov. 26, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1600EM _ Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Valcour Development Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals from the adverse decision of the district court and the jury in this diversity action
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1600EM _ Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Valcour Development Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals from the adverse decision of the district court and the jury in this diversity action...
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-1600EM _____________ Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Valcour Development Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _____________ Submitted: November 17, 1997 Filed: November 26, 1997 _____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals from the adverse decision of the district court and the jury in this diversity action. After reviewing the record, we conclude there is sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict and Wal-Mart's claims of trial error are without merit. Having ruled against Wal-Mart on the merits, we need not address its claim for prejudgment interest. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
