Filed: Jan. 07, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-2332EM _ Harbor Venture, Inc.; Horseshoe * Casinos, (Missouri), L.L.C.; Missouri * River Equities, Inc., * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * John Nichols; Missouri Coalition for * [UNPUBLISHED] the Environment, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 10, 1997 Filed: January 7, 1998 _ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ha
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-2332EM _ Harbor Venture, Inc.; Horseshoe * Casinos, (Missouri), L.L.C.; Missouri * River Equities, Inc., * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * John Nichols; Missouri Coalition for * [UNPUBLISHED] the Environment, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 10, 1997 Filed: January 7, 1998 _ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Har..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-2332EM _____________ Harbor Venture, Inc.; Horseshoe * Casinos, (Missouri), L.L.C.; Missouri * River Equities, Inc., * * Appellants, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * John Nichols; Missouri Coalition for * [UNPUBLISHED] the Environment, * * Appellees. * _____________ Submitted: December 10, 1997 Filed: January 7, 1998 _____________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM. Harbor Venture, Inc., Horseshoe Casinos, L.L.C., and Missouri River Equities, Inc. appeal the district court's ruling rejecting their contention that a gambling enterprise is permitted on real estate governed by the terms of a 1976 consent decree. After de novo review, we are satisfied the district court correctly interpreted the consent decree and the record supports the district court's ruling. Because a comprehensive opinion in this case would lack precedential value, we affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
