Filed: Mar. 27, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-3846 _ Larry A. Eaton, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Lynne Delano, formerly the Secretary * of Corrections, State of South Dakota; * Joseph Class, as the Warden of South * Appeal from the United States Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls; * District Court for the Jim Smith, formerly the Warden of * District of South Dakota. South Dakota State Correctional * Facility, Springfield; Daryl Slykhuis, * [UNPUBLISHED] as the Deputy Superinte
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-3846 _ Larry A. Eaton, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Lynne Delano, formerly the Secretary * of Corrections, State of South Dakota; * Joseph Class, as the Warden of South * Appeal from the United States Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls; * District Court for the Jim Smith, formerly the Warden of * District of South Dakota. South Dakota State Correctional * Facility, Springfield; Daryl Slykhuis, * [UNPUBLISHED] as the Deputy Superinten..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 96-3846
___________
Larry A. Eaton, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Lynne Delano, formerly the Secretary *
of Corrections, State of South Dakota; *
Joseph Class, as the Warden of South *
Appeal from the United States
Dakota State Penitentiary, Sioux Falls; *
District Court for the
Jim Smith, formerly the Warden of *
District of South Dakota.
South Dakota State Correctional *
Facility, Springfield; Daryl Slykhuis, *
[UNPUBLISHED]
as the Deputy Superintendent of *
Programs; Patty Veatch, employee of *
South Dakota State Penitentiary; Doug *
Wynia, employee of Springfield *
Correctional Facility, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: February 13,
1998
Filed: March 27,
1998
___________
Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Larry A. Eaton appeals from the district court&s1
adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
action against five South Dakota Department of
Corrections employees and a mental health therapist
working at the Department of Corrections. Eaton alleged
defendants violated his Eighth Amendment and due process
rights. Upon review of parties& submissions and briefs,
we conclude the allegations in Eaton&s complaint are
insufficient to state a claim for relief. See Handeen v.
LeMaire,
112 F.3d 1339, 1346-47 (8th Cir. 1997) (holding
that summary judgment may be affirmed where plaintiff&s
factual allegations, though unchallenged, fail to state
claim for relief). Accordingly we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Honorable John B. Jones, United States District Judge for the District of
South Dakota.
-2-