Filed: Mar. 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-3791EM _ Tammy Kwikkel-Elliott; * * Plaintiff, * * William Elliott, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Plaintiff-Appellant, * District of Missouri. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Aid Association for Lutherans, * * Defendant-Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 13, 1998 Filed: March 18, 1998 _ Before FAGG and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and EISELE,* District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. William Elliott appeals the district court's a
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-3791EM _ Tammy Kwikkel-Elliott; * * Plaintiff, * * William Elliott, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Plaintiff-Appellant, * District of Missouri. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Aid Association for Lutherans, * * Defendant-Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 13, 1998 Filed: March 18, 1998 _ Before FAGG and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and EISELE,* District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. William Elliott appeals the district court's ad..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-3791EM _____________ Tammy Kwikkel-Elliott; * * Plaintiff, * * William Elliott, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern Plaintiff-Appellant, * District of Missouri. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Aid Association for Lutherans, * * Defendant-Appellee. * _____________ Submitted: March 13, 1998 Filed: March 18, 1998 _____________ Before FAGG and ROSS, Circuit Judges, and EISELE,* District Judge. _____________ PER CURIAM. William Elliott appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in this retaliation-based employment discrimination action. Having reviewed the record and the materials submitted by the parties, we see no error by the district court. The * The Honorable G. Thomas Eisele, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, sitting by designation. district court has written a well-reasoned opinion in this fact-intensive case, and we conclude that an extended discussion is unnecessary. We believe the district court is correct, and we affirm on the basis of the district court's memorandum and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
