Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

L.R. School District v. Lorene Joshua, 97-1689 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-1689 Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 18, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Nos. 97-1689 and 97-1700 Little Rock School District, * * Plaintiff, * * Servicemaster Management Services; * Blytheville School District; Bryant * School District; Fort Smith School * District; West Memphis School * District; Altus-Denning School * District; Ashdown School District; * Barton-Lexa School District; Batesville * School District; Biggers-Reyno * School District; Black Rock School * District; Bright Star School District; * Appeal
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT Nos. 97-1689 and 97-1700 Little Rock School District, * * Plaintiff, * * Servicemaster Management Services; * Blytheville School District; Bryant * School District; Fort Smith School * District; West Memphis School * District; Altus-Denning School * District; Ashdown School District; * Barton-Lexa School District; Batesville * School District; Biggers-Reyno * School District; Black Rock School * District; Bright Star School District; * Appeals from the United States Brinkley School District; Centerpoint * District Court for the School District; Clarendon School * Eastern District of Arkansas. District; Cotton Plant School District; * Cutter Morning Star School District; * Dewitt School District; Dollarway * School District; Foreman School * District; Fountain Lake School District; * Gillett School District; Glen Rose * School District; Guy-Perkins School * District; Hoxie School District; * Jonesboro School District; Kirby * School District; LaVaca School District; * Lewisville School District; Magazine * School District; Malvern School * District; Mammoth Spring School * District; Manila School District; * Maynard School District; Oden * School District; Ozark School District; * Plainview-Rover School District; * Pocahontas School District; Prairie * Grove School District; South Conway * School District; Spring Hill School * District; Stamps School District; * Stephens School District; Turrell * School District; Van Buren School * District; Warren School District; * Watson Chapel School District; * West Fork School District; White Hall * School District; Winslow School * District; Wonderview School District; * Yellville-Summit School District; * Alma School District; Alread School * District; Beebe School District; * Bentonville School District; Bergman * School District; Berryville School * District; Blevins School District; * Booneville School District; Bradford * School District; Buffalo Island School * District; Caddo Hills School District; * Carthage School District; Charleston * School District; Corning School * District; County Line Public School; * Crossett School District; Decatur * School District; Dermott School * District; Dumas School District; Elaine * School District; Fordyce School * District; Gosnell School District; Grady * School District; Greeb County * Technical Schools; Green Forest * School District; Greenland School * District; Greenwood School District; * Harrisburg School District; Hamburg * School District; Holly Grove School * 2 District; Huttig School District; * Jackson County School District; * Junction City School District; Lakeside * School District; Lead Hill School * District; Leslie School District; Marion * School District; Marshall School * District; Mayflower School District; * McGehee School District; Mountain- * burg School District; Nettleton School * District; Newport School District; Ola * School District; Paragould School * District; Parkin School District; * Pleasant View School District; Quitman * School District; Rural Special School * District; Saratoga School District; * Searcy School District; Smackover * School District; Southside School * District #2 Bee Branch; Strong * School District; Stuttgart School * District; Valley Spring School District; * Waldron School District; Weiner * School District; Wickes School District; * Wynne School District; North Little * Rock Classroom Teachers Association; * Pulaski Association of Classroom * Teachers; Little Rock Classroom * Teachers Association, * * Intervenor Plaintiffs, * * Alexa Armstrong; Karlos Armstrong, * * Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants, * * Ed Bullington, * * Intervenor Plaintiff, * 3 Khayyam Davis, * * Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellant, * * John Harrison, * * Intervenor Plaintiff, * * Alvin Hudson; Tatia Hudson, * * Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants, * * Milton Jackson, * * Intervenor Plaintiff, * * Lorene Joshua; Leslie Joshua; Stacy * Joshua; Wayne Joshua, * * Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants, * * Katherine Knight, * * Intervenor Plaintiff, * * Sara Facen; Derrick Miles; Janice * Miles; John M. Miles; NAACP; Joyce * Person; Brian Taylor; Hilton Taylor; * Parsha Taylor; Robert Willingham; * Tonya Willingham, * * Intervenor Plaintiffs-Appellants, * * v. * * North Little Rock School District, * * 4 Defendant, * * Pulaski County Special School District, * * Defendant-Appellee, * * State of Arkansas, * * Defendant, * * Office of Desegregation Monitor, * * Claimant, * * Northeast Arkansas School District, * * Movant, * ----------------------------------- Dale Charles; Robert L. Brown, Sr.; * Gwen Hevey Jackson; Diane Davis; * Raymond Frazier, * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * Pulaski County Board of Education; * Patricia Gee, Individually and in her * Official Capacity as a Member of the * Board of Education of the Little Rock * School District, a Public Body; George * Cannon, Dr., Individually and in his * Official Capacity as a Member of the * Board of Education of the Little Rock * School District, a Public Body; * Katherine Mitchell, Dr., Individually * and in her Official Capacity as a * 5 Member of the Board of Education of * the Little Rock School District, a Public * Body; W. D. Hamilton, also known as * Bill Hamilton, Individually, and in his * Official Capacity as a Member of the * Board of Education of the Little Rock * School District, a Public Body; Cecil * Bailey, Individually and in his Official * Capacity as a Member of the Pulaski * County Board of Education, a Public * Corporate; Thomas Broughton, * Individually and in his Official Capacity * as a Member of the Pulaski County * Board of Education, a Public * Corporate; Martin Zoldessy, Dr., * Individually and in his Official * Capacity as a Member of the Pulaski * County Board of Education, a Public * Corporate, * Defendants. * Submitted: February 24, 1998 Filed: March 18, 1998 Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge, HEANEY and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges. HEANEY, Circuit Judge. In this continuing desegregation litigation, the Joshua appellants represent the class of black school children and citizens. In this consolidated appeal, they contend 6 that the district court’s denial without a hearing of the Joshua appellants’ motion with respect to the Robinson High School in the Pulaski County Special School District (PCSSD) was based on a mistake of law and constituted abuse of discretion.1 On November 1, 1996, the Joshua appellants asked the district court to either direct the Office of Desegregation Monitor (ODM) to investigate or set a hearing to determine whether the PCSSD should be held in contempt regarding allegations concerning the principal at Robinson High School. The court denied the Joshua appellants’ motion, stating that it considered the allegations against the principal at Robinson High School an individual personnel matter that should be addressed by the PCSSD according to its own procedures. Subsequent to the district court’s issuance of its order, the Robinson High School principal’s employment ended. Consequently, the issue is moot, and we decline to issue an advisory opinion with respect to how the district court should handle similar allegations in the future. For the aforementioned reasons, we dismiss the appeal as moot. 1 In their brief, the Joshua appellants also challenged the district court’s action with respect to their motions concerning incentive schools in the Little Rock School District (LRSD) and the monitoring thereof as inconsistent with earlier mandates of this court. Before oral argument, the Joshua appellants and LRSD reached an agreement, resolving the issues concerning the incentive schools and LRSD. Consequently, on February 24, 1998, we issued an order dismissing the appeals against LRSD and there is no need to reach the merits of this appeal insofar as it involves the incentive schools. 7 A true copy. Attest. CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. 8
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer