Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jeffrey Kurtzman v. Washington Univ., 97-3051 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-3051 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 17, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-3051 _ Jeffrey Kurtzman, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Washington University, a Benevolent * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 10, 1998 Filed: March 17, 1998 _ Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Kurtzman sued The Washington University, claiming disparate-treatment se
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-3051 _____________ Jeffrey Kurtzman, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Missouri. * Washington University, a Benevolent * [UNPUBLISHED] Corporation, * * Appellee. * _____________ Submitted: March 10, 1998 Filed: March 17, 1998 _____________ Before BOWMAN, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM. Jeffrey Kurtzman sued The Washington University, claiming disparate-treatment sex and race discrimination, denial of due process, and breach of contract. The District Court1 granted summary judgment for the defendant and dismissed the First Amended Complaint. The court also denied Kurtzman's untimely motion for leave to file a 1 The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Second Amended Complaint. Kurtzman appeals the orders granting summary judgment and denying his motion for leave to amend. Having considered the briefs, the record, and the arguments of the parties, we find no error of law or abuse of discretion in the District Court's rulings. We also find that the case does not offer sufficient precedential value to warrant an opinion. Accordingly, we forego extended discussion. The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer