Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Jacob O. Berry v. Assembly of God, 97-1804 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 97-1804 Visitors: 29
Filed: Apr. 14, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-1804 _ Jacob O. Berry, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Assembly of God, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: April 6, 1998 Filed: April 14, 1998 _ Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jacob O. Berry appeals the district court&s1 conclusion that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over an action Berry brought again
More
                          United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 97-1804
                                   ___________

Jacob O. Berry,                         *
                                        *
             Appellant,                 *
                                        *     Appeal from United States
      v.                                *     District Court for the
                                        *     District of South Dakota.
Assembly of God,                        *         [UNPUBLISHED]
                                        *
             Appellee.                  *
                                   ___________

                           Submitted: April 6, 1998

                               Filed: April 14, 1998
                                   ___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit
      Judges.
                       ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Jacob O. Berry appeals the district court&s1 conclusion that it lacked subject
matter jurisdiction over an action Berry brought against the Assembly of God, General
Council. Based on the record and the parties& briefs, we conclude that the court&s
determination was correct and that an extended discussion is not warranted. The
judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


      1
       The Honorable Richard H. Battey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of South Dakota.
A true copy.

      Attest:

               CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                              -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer