Filed: May 27, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-4093 _ Elmer Oberhellmann, beneficiary * of Elmer Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined * Benefit Pension Plan, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Brian Hodak, also known as Bryon * Appeal from the United States Hodak, Fiduciary of the Elmer * District Court for the Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined Benefit * Eastern District of Missouri. Pension Plan, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant, * * Kristin Petersen Oberhellmann, * Fiduciary and Trustee of the Elmer * Oberhe
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 96-4093 _ Elmer Oberhellmann, beneficiary * of Elmer Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined * Benefit Pension Plan, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Brian Hodak, also known as Bryon * Appeal from the United States Hodak, Fiduciary of the Elmer * District Court for the Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined Benefit * Eastern District of Missouri. Pension Plan, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant, * * Kristin Petersen Oberhellmann, * Fiduciary and Trustee of the Elmer * Oberhel..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 96-4093
___________
Elmer Oberhellmann, beneficiary *
of Elmer Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined *
Benefit Pension Plan, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Brian Hodak, also known as Bryon * Appeal from the United States
Hodak, Fiduciary of the Elmer * District Court for the
Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined Benefit * Eastern District of Missouri.
Pension Plan, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Defendant, *
*
Kristin Petersen Oberhellmann, *
Fiduciary and Trustee of the Elmer *
Oberhellmann, Inc. Defined Benefit *
Pension Plan; Kristin Petersen *
Oberhellmann, Individually; Joann *
Newman; Bradley Winters, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 21, 1998
Filed: May 27, 1998
___________
Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,
Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Elmer Oberhellmann filed a notice of appeal from the district court’s1 order
dismissing his action. Because that order did not dispose of Kristin Oberhellmann’s
counterclaim against Elmer Oberhellmann, it was not a final order and we lack
jurisdiction to review it. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Thomas v.
Basham,
931 F.2d 521, 522-23 (8th Cir. 1991). We therefore dismiss the appeal.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
-2-