Filed: May 21, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-3834MN _ Francis Dick, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law * Enforcement, Local 320; Harold Yates, * Appeal from the United States Its Trustee; International Brotherhood of * District Court for the District Teamsters; * of Minnesota. * Defendants-Appellees, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Central States Southeast and Southwest * Area Pension and Health & Welfare * Fund, * * Defendants. * _ Submitted: May 11, 1998
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-3834MN _ Francis Dick, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law * Enforcement, Local 320; Harold Yates, * Appeal from the United States Its Trustee; International Brotherhood of * District Court for the District Teamsters; * of Minnesota. * Defendants-Appellees, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Central States Southeast and Southwest * Area Pension and Health & Welfare * Fund, * * Defendants. * _ Submitted: May 11, 1998 ..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _____________ No. 97-3834MN _____________ Francis Dick, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Minnesota Teamsters Public and Law * Enforcement, Local 320; Harold Yates, * Appeal from the United States Its Trustee; International Brotherhood of * District Court for the District Teamsters; * of Minnesota. * Defendants-Appellees, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Central States Southeast and Southwest * Area Pension and Health & Welfare * Fund, * * Defendants. * _____________ Submitted: May 11, 1998 Filed: May 21, 1998 _____________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, JOHN R. GIBSON, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _____________ PER CURIAM. Francis Dick appeals the district court's order dismissing Dick's complaint against his former employer in this employment-related lawsuit. After de novo review, we conclude the district court's grant of judgment on the pleadings was proper. We agree with the district court that Dick failed to exhaust his union remedies. We also conclude that Dick's additional arguments on appeal are without merit. We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
