Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Vance and Helen Mauney, 5583_1 (1957)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 5583_1 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 20, 1957
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 245 F.2d 956 UNITED STATES of America v. Vance and Helen MAUNEY. No. 5583. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. March 20, 1957. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico. Paul F. Larrazolo, U. S. Atty., and James A. Borland, Asst. U. S. Atty., Albuquerque, N. M., and Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant. Keleher & McLeod, Albuquerque, N. M., and Felix Atwood, Dallas, Tex., for appellee. Before BRATTO
More

245 F.2d 956

UNITED STATES of America
v.
Vance and Helen MAUNEY.

No. 5583.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

March 20, 1957.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico.

Paul F. Larrazolo, U. S. Atty., and James A. Borland, Asst. U. S. Atty., Albuquerque, N. M., and Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Keleher & McLeod, Albuquerque, N. M., and Felix Atwood, Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

Before BRATTON, Chief Judge.

1

Appeal dismissed on motion of appellant.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer