Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

David L. Parrish v. State of Nebraska, 98-1692 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-1692 Visitors: 35
Filed: Nov. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-1692 _ David L. Parrish, * * Appellant, * * v. * * State of Nebraska; Nebraska Workers& * Compensation Court; Holiday Inn; * Appeal from the United States Joseph Grant, doing business as Gains, * District Court for the Mullin, Pansing & Hogan; Melvin C. * District of Nebraska. Hansen, doing business as Hansen, * Engles & Locher; United States * [UNPUBLISHED] Fidelity & Guarantee, doing business * as United States Fidelity & Guaranty
More
                    United States Court of Appeals
                         FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                ___________

                                No. 98-1692
                                ___________

David L. Parrish,                       *
                                        *
             Appellant,                 *
                                        *
       v.                               *
                                        *
State of Nebraska; Nebraska Workers& *
Compensation Court; Holiday Inn;        * Appeal from the United States
Joseph Grant, doing business as Gains, * District Court for the
Mullin, Pansing & Hogan; Melvin C.      * District of Nebraska.
Hansen, doing business as Hansen,       *
Engles & Locher; United States          *        [UNPUBLISHED]
Fidelity & Guarantee, doing business    *
as United States Fidelity & Guaranty    *
Company,                                *
                                        *
             Appellees.                 *
                                   ___________

                        Submitted: October 7, 1998

                            Filed: November 16, 1998
                                ___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD
      ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
                              ___________
PER CURIAM.

       David L. Parrish appeals from the district court&s1 dismissal of his complaint
without prejudice for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Having
carefully reviewed the record and Mr. Parrish&s submissions on appeal, we conclude
the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Mr. Parrish&s complaint. See
Atkins v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 
967 F.2d 1197
, 1203 (8th Cir. 1992) (standard of
review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. 8th Cir. R. 47B.



      We also deny all of Mr. Parrish&s pending motions.

      A true copy.

             Attest:

                     CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




      1
       The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, United States District
Court for the District of Nebraska.

                                           -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer