Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Troy L. Gill, 98-3285 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-3285 Visitors: 14
Filed: Feb. 01, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3285 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Troy L. Gill, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: January 12, 1999 Filed: February 1, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, MURPHY, Circuit Judge, and ALSOP,1 District Judge. _ PER CURIAM. Troy L. Gill, convicted after trial by jury of bank robbery and a related firearm offense, appeals the
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-3285 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * Troy L. Gill, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: January 12, 1999 Filed: February 1, 1999 ___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, MURPHY, Circuit Judge, and ALSOP,1 District Judge. ___________ PER CURIAM. Troy L. Gill, convicted after trial by jury of bank robbery and a related firearm offense, appeals the denial by the District Court2 of his motion for a judgment of 1 The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. 2 The Honorable Russell G. Clark, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. acquittal. His appeal thus challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support he jury's verdict. Having carefully reviewed the case, we are satisfied the evidence is sufficient to support the jury's verdict on each of the two counts of conviction. The District Court therefore did not err in denying Gill's motion for a judgment of acquittal. By means of a pro se supplemental brief, Gill has attempted to raise a Singleton "bribery" issue. Because that issue was not raised in the District Court, it is not properly before us, and we do not address it. The judgment of conviction entered on the jury's verdict is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer