Filed: Mar. 29, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3047 _ Martin Robert Czeck, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota United States of America, * * (UNPUBLISHED) Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 12, 1999 Filed: March 29, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Martin Robert Czeck appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota denying his 28 U.
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3047 _ Martin Robert Czeck, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota United States of America, * * (UNPUBLISHED) Appellee. * _ Submitted: February 12, 1999 Filed: March 29, 1999 _ Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Martin Robert Czeck appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the District of Minnesota denying his 28 U.S..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-3047
___________
Martin Robert Czeck, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota
United States of America, *
* (UNPUBLISHED)
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: February 12, 1999
Filed: March 29, 1999
___________
Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Martin Robert Czeck appeals from the final judgment entered in the District
Court1 for the District of Minnesota denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, in which
Czeck argued that the admission of his prior-felony-conviction record substantially
prejudiced his criminal trial. Upon careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs,
we conclude the denial was proper because any error in admitting the conviction
1
The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.
record was harmless given the ample evidence of guilt. Accordingly, we affirm. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-