Filed: May 24, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3983 _ Roosevelt J. Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri Lucent Technologies, Inc.; John L. * Cimino; Christopher P. Cummings, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 7, 1999 Filed: May 24, 1999 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Roosevelt J. Smith brought an employment discrimination action against Lucen
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3983 _ Roosevelt J. Smith, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri Lucent Technologies, Inc.; John L. * Cimino; Christopher P. Cummings, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 7, 1999 Filed: May 24, 1999 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Roosevelt J. Smith brought an employment discrimination action against Lucent..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-3983
___________
Roosevelt J. Smith, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri
Lucent Technologies, Inc.; John L. *
Cimino; Christopher P. Cummings, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 7, 1999
Filed: May 24, 1999
___________
Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Roosevelt J. Smith brought an employment discrimination action against Lucent
Technologies (Lucent), John L. Cimino, and Christopher P. Cummings. The district
court1 dismissed the action with prejudice for failure to state a claim and for failure to
prosecute and comply with the court’s orders. Mr. Smith appeals, arguing for the first
time that the district court should have compelled arbitration, as the Federal Arbitration
1
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
Act and the union contract with Lucent required arbitration. We do not consider
arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Dorothy J. v. Little Rock Sch. Dist.,
7 F.3d 729, 734 (8th Cir. 1993).
Accordingly, we affirm.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-