Filed: May 14, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1743 _ Avery D. Williams, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Appeal from the United States Department of Correction; Perry, * District Court for the Major, Chief of Security, North * Eastern District of Arkansas. Central Unit; Steve Lively, * Disciplinary Hearing Officer, North * [PUBLISHED] Central Unit; Larry May, Warden/ * Center Supervisor, North Central * Unit; David Guntharp, Grievance * Administrator,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1743 _ Avery D. Williams, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Appeal from the United States Department of Correction; Perry, * District Court for the Major, Chief of Security, North * Eastern District of Arkansas. Central Unit; Steve Lively, * Disciplinary Hearing Officer, North * [PUBLISHED] Central Unit; Larry May, Warden/ * Center Supervisor, North Central * Unit; David Guntharp, Grievance * Administrator, ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-1743
___________
Avery D. Williams, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
*
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Appeal from the United States
Department of Correction; Perry, * District Court for the
Major, Chief of Security, North * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Central Unit; Steve Lively, *
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, North * [PUBLISHED]
Central Unit; Larry May, Warden/ *
Center Supervisor, North Central *
Unit; David Guntharp, Grievance *
Administrator, Central Office, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: April 7, 1999
Filed: May 14, 1999
___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit
Judges
___________
PER CURIAM.
Avery D. Williams, an Arkansas inmate, appeals from the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies
as required under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Williams had claimed that Arkansas
Department of Correction officials violated his constitutional rights and his rights under
the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb-2000bb-4, by imposing
a grooming policy which prohibited Williams--a Rastafarian--from wearing his hair in
“dreadlocks.” We conclude the district court improperly granted defendants’ motion
to dismiss, as the record demonstrates that Williams’s grievance had been denied by
the Warden and the Assistant Director at the time the court ruled. Accordingly, we
reverse and remand to allow Williams an opportunity to proceed on his claims.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-