Filed: May 11, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-4266 _ Herbert Phillip Malone, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Steve Walton, Infirmary * District Court for the Administrator/Manager, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction; PHP * Healthcare Corporation, (Originally * [UNPUBLISHED] sued as P.H.P. Medical Group), * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 6, 1999 Filed: May 11, 1999 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM,
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 97-4266 _ Herbert Phillip Malone, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Appeal from the United States Steve Walton, Infirmary * District Court for the Administrator/Manager, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas. Department of Correction; PHP * Healthcare Corporation, (Originally * [UNPUBLISHED] sued as P.H.P. Medical Group), * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 6, 1999 Filed: May 11, 1999 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 97-4266
___________
Herbert Phillip Malone, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. *
* Appeal from the United States
Steve Walton, Infirmary * District Court for the
Administrator/Manager, Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas.
Department of Correction; PHP *
Healthcare Corporation, (Originally * [UNPUBLISHED]
sued as P.H.P. Medical Group), *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 6, 1999
Filed: May 11, 1999
___________
Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit
Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Herbert P. Malone appeals the judgment of the district court1 dismissing his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action following a bench trial. Because Malone did not provide a trial
1
The Honorable Henry L. Jones, Jr., United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
transcript, we cannot review the court’s factual findings, Malone’s claim of judicial
bias, or the denial of his evidentiary motions, including his motions to call witnesses.
See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); Van Treese v. Blome,
7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per
curiam). Based on the district court’s factual findings, we conclude the court properly
rejected Malone’s medical indifference claim. See Dulany v. Carnahan,
132 F.3d
1234, 1239 (8th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-