Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Daniel Koehler, 98-3589 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-3589 Visitors: 55
Filed: Jun. 21, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3589 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Daniel Raymond Koehler, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 11, 1999 Filed: June 21, 1999 _ Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Having been convicted of drug-related offenses, Daniel Raymond Koehler filed his notice of appeal twelve days af
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 98-3589
                                   ___________

United States of America,               *
                                        *
                   Appellee,            * Appeal from the United States
                                        * District Court for the Eastern
      v.                                * District of Missouri.
                                        *
Daniel Raymond Koehler,                 *      [UNPUBLISHED]
                                        *
                   Appellant.           *
                                   ___________

                            Submitted: June 11, 1999
                                Filed: June 21, 1999
                                   ___________

Before HANSEN, FAGG, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Having been convicted of drug-related offenses, Daniel Raymond Koehler filed
his notice of appeal twelve days after judgment was entered in the district court.
Although Koehler's notice of appeal is untimely, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A), we
remand the case to the district court to determine whether Koehler's time for filing a
notice of appeal should be extended under Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(4). See United States
v. Petty, 
82 F.3d 809
, 810 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam).
A true copy.

      Attest:

               CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT




                              -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer