Filed: Nov. 05, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1390 _ Ruth A. Ebner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster * General, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 1, 1999 Filed: November 5, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ruth Ebner appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing her Title VII action for lack of subject matter j
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1390 _ Ruth A. Ebner, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster * General, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 1, 1999 Filed: November 5, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ruth Ebner appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing her Title VII action for lack of subject matter ju..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-1390
___________
Ruth A. Ebner, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Marvin T. Runyon, Jr., Postmaster *
General, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 1, 1999
Filed: November 5, 1999
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ruth Ebner appeals from the district court’s1 order dismissing her Title VII
action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. After carefully reviewing the district
court’s findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo, see Drevlow
v. Lutheran Church, Mo. Synod,
991 F.2d 468, 470 (8th Cir. 1993), we conclude the
court did not err in dismissing Ebner’s action. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
1
The Honorable Donald J. Stohr, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
stated in the district court’s order. We also deny Ebner’s motion for appointment of
counsel. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-