Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Julius Perry v. Marvin Runyon, 98-1446 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 98-1446 Visitors: 43
Filed: Nov. 04, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-1446 _ Julius Perry, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Marvin Runyon, in his official * Western District of Missouri. capacity as Postmaster General of * the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 17, 1999 Filed: November 4, 1999 _ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and SIPPEL,* District Judge. PER CURIAM. Julius Perry w
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 98-1446 ___________ Julius Perry, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Marvin Runyon, in his official * Western District of Missouri. capacity as Postmaster General of * the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: September 17, 1999 Filed: November 4, 1999 ___________ Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD and LOKEN, Circuit Judges, and SIPPEL,* District Judge. PER CURIAM. Julius Perry was terminated by the United States Postal Service in July 1995 for an incident in which he was “argumentative, loud and screaming at your supervisor,” and for his many prior instances of abusive and disruptive behavior. After exhausting * The HONORABLE RODNEY W. SIPPEL, United States District Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Missouri, sitting by designation. his administrative remedies, including unsuccessful arbitration, Perry commenced this action against the Postmaster General, alleging that the termination was motivated by age, race, and disability discrimination, and was unlawful retaliation for Perry’s EEO complaints and successful appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board in the late 1980’s. The district court1 granted summary judgment dismissing all his claims. Perry appeals the dismissal of his unlawful retaliation claim, arguing that a jury could find that he was fired for his prior discipline problems, and that there was a causal relation between this adverse employment action and his prior EEO complaints. After careful review of the record, giving Perry the benefit of all inferences that may reasonably be drawn from the evidence and reviewing the grant of summary judgment de novo, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s Order dated November 26, 1997. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. 1 The HONORABLE ORTRIE D. SMITH, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer