Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Alfredo Perez Pena v. Red Wing Shoe Co., 99-1347 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 99-1347 Visitors: 31
Filed: Nov. 01, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1347 _ Alfredo Perez Pena, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District of * Minnesota. Red Wing Shoe Co., A Minnesota * Corporation, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: October 22, 1999 Filed: November 1, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Alfredo Perez Pena appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment that dismissed his claim of rac
More
                      United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 99-1347
                                    ___________

Alfredo Perez Pena,                 *
                                    *
             Appellant,             *
                                    * Appeal from the United States
     v.                             * District Court for the District of
                                    * Minnesota.
Red Wing Shoe Co., A Minnesota      *
Corporation,                        *        [UNPUBLISHED]
                                    *
             Appellee.              *
                               ___________

                              Submitted: October 22, 1999

                                   Filed: November 1, 1999
                                    ___________

Before BOWMAN, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.
                          ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Alfredo Perez Pena appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment that
dismissed his claim of racial discrimination in hiring against Red Wing Shoe Company
brought under Title VII and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Pena also appeals the
district court's denial of his motion to compel a response to discovery and the award
of sanctions imposed for bringing that motion. We have reviewed the parties' briefs
and the record, and we affirm the dismissal of the claim on the basis of the well-
reasoned order of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also affirm the denial of
the discovery motion and the award of sanctions on the basis of the magistrate judge's
thorough order as affirmed by the district court. See 
id. A true
copy.

             Attest:

                CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer