Filed: Dec. 10, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3997 _ Gary James Walker, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Railroad Retirement Board. * Railroad Retirement Board, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: December 7, 1999 Filed: December 10, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Gary James Walker petitions for review of an order of the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) denying his appeal. Walker contends the Board e
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 98-3997 _ Gary James Walker, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an Order v. * of the Railroad Retirement Board. * Railroad Retirement Board, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: December 7, 1999 Filed: December 10, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Gary James Walker petitions for review of an order of the Railroad Retirement Board (Board) denying his appeal. Walker contends the Board er..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 98-3997
___________
Gary James Walker, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of an Order
v. * of the Railroad Retirement Board.
*
Railroad Retirement Board, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: December 7, 1999
Filed: December 10, 1999
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Gary James Walker petitions for review of an order of the Railroad Retirement
Board (Board) denying his appeal. Walker contends the Board erroneously decided it
was required to honor a state court order that a portion of Walker's Railroad Retirement
Act disability benefits be paid to his former wife. Having reviewed the record and the
parties' submissions, we conclude the Board's finding that it was required by law and
regulation to comply with the order was supported by substantial evidence. See 45
U.S.C. § 231m(b)(2); 20 C.F.R. §§ 295.2-.4; King v. Railroad Retirement Bd.,
981
F.2d 365, 367 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (standard of review).
Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Board.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-