Filed: Dec. 02, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2708 _ Andrew Elliott, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 24, 1999 Filed: December 2, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Andrew Elliott sought judicial review when his social security claim was denied. The district court ord
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2708 _ Andrew Elliott, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Kenneth S. Apfel, Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED] Administration, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 24, 1999 Filed: December 2, 1999 _ Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Andrew Elliott sought judicial review when his social security claim was denied. The district court orde..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 99-2708
___________
Andrew Elliott, *
*
Appellant, * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Eastern
v. * District of Missouri.
*
Kenneth S. Apfel, Social Security * [UNPUBLISHED]
Administration, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 24, 1999
Filed: December 2, 1999
___________
Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Andrew Elliott sought judicial review when his social security claim was denied.
The district court ordered him twice over a three-year period to file a motion for
summary judgment, but he did not do so. The district court then dismissed his
complaint without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Elliott appeals. Having reviewed
the record and the briefs, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in
dismissing the complaint. See Garland v. Peebles,
1 F.3d 683, 686 (8th Cir. 1993)
(standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-