Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Charles Gibbon, 99-2713 (2000)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 99-2713 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jan. 25, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2713 _ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern District * of Arkansas. Charles Gibbon, * * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendant - Appellant. * _ Submitted: January 12, 2000 Filed: January 25, 2000 _ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Gibbon was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine base with
More
                           United States Court of Appeals
                              FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                      __________

                                      No. 99-2713
                                      __________

United States of America,              *
                                       *
            Plaintiff - Appellee,      *
                                       * Appeal from the United States
      v.                               * District Court for the Eastern District
                                       * of Arkansas.
Charles Gibbon,                        *
                                       *        [UNPUBLISHED]
                                       *
            Defendant - Appellant.     *
                                  ___________

                               Submitted: January 12, 2000
                                   Filed: January 25, 2000
                                    ___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD and
MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                             __________

PER CURIAM.

        Charles Gibbon was convicted by a jury of possession of cocaine base with
intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. ยง 841(a)(1). On appeal he argues that there
was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. After carefully reviewing the
record, we are satisfied that a rational jury could have found the essential elements of
the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. See U.S. v. Liebo, 
923 F.2d 1308
, 1311 (8th
Cir. 1991). We affirm the judgment of the district court1 without further discussion.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

       A true copy.

             Attest:

                CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.




   1
    The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.

                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer