Filed: Jan. 20, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2408 _ Richard W. Caw, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 12, 2000 Filed: January 20, 2000 _ Before HANSEN, BRIGHT, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Richard W. Caw appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Caw sup
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-2408 _ Richard W. Caw, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 12, 2000 Filed: January 20, 2000 _ Before HANSEN, BRIGHT, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Richard W. Caw appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Caw supp..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-2408 ___________ Richard W. Caw, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of * Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: January 12, 2000 Filed: January 20, 2000 ___________ Before HANSEN, BRIGHT, and FAGG, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Richard W. Caw appeals the district court's order affirming the Commissioner's decision to deny Caw supplemental security income benefits. Having reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that no error of law or fact appears. We are also satisfied this case presents no novel issues to justify an extended opinion. We find substantial evidence on the record as a whole supports the decision of the Commissioner, and Caw is not disabled for social security purposes. We thus affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
