Filed: Jan. 14, 2000
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1801 _ Judy Danielson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the State of Nebraska, Acting by and * District of Nebraska. through the Department of Correctional * Services and Harold Clarke, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 6, 2000 Filed: January 14, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Judy Danielson, a psychologist formerly empl
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 99-1801 _ Judy Danielson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the State of Nebraska, Acting by and * District of Nebraska. through the Department of Correctional * Services and Harold Clarke, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 6, 2000 Filed: January 14, 2000 _ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Judy Danielson, a psychologist formerly emplo..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 99-1801 ___________ Judy Danielson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the State of Nebraska, Acting by and * District of Nebraska. through the Department of Correctional * Services and Harold Clarke, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * ___________ Submitted: January 6, 2000 Filed: January 14, 2000 ___________ Before BOWMAN, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Judy Danielson, a psychologist formerly employed at a Nebraska prison, appeals from the district court&s1 grant of summary judgment in her employment discrimination action against her former employer. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that summary judgment was appropriate, for the reasons explained by the district court. 1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. We also deny her pending motion. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT. -2-
